Skip to content

Added a mention to APCu Polyfill in the performance article #7509

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

This fixes #6827.

xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2017
…le (javiereguiluz)

This PR was submitted for the 2.8 branch but it was merged into the 2.7 branch instead (closes #7509).

Discussion
----------

Added a mention to APCu Polyfill in the performance article

This fixes #6827.

Commits
-------

0b38670 Added a mention to APCu Polyfill in the performance article
xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2017
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Mar 7, 2017

Thanks Javier. I have added the missing references in cc3874f.

@xabbuh xabbuh closed this Mar 7, 2017
xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2017
* 2.7: (30 commits)
  [#7560] remove unused use statements
  Resolving $this usage outside a class on form.rst
  Fix some odd English in the PDOSessionHandler docs
  Fix typo
  Add the description for the HTTP status because it's not that common
  Update exception code status
  [#7592] some minor tweaks
  Fix link for Twig Extensions documentation
  Update framework.rst [Fix esi tag]
  Update render_without_controller.rst
  Update matchers.rst
  Update matchers.rst
  Update locale_sticky_session.rst
  Update framework.rst
  Update import.rst
  Update load_balancer_reverse_proxy.rst
  Moved the requirements file
  [#7509] add missing references
  Added a mention to APCu Polyfill in the performance article
  [#7497] minor rewording
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants